Student Research Days

About Student Research Days

swag�鶹 Student Research Days is an annual event where students showcase their hard work and discoveries from individual or group research projects.

Students can submit work and win a prize in one of three categories.

Research proposal

Apply in this category if you have planned a research project but have not yet collected and analyzed data OR if your project data are primarily secondary in nature, e.g., not data arising from your own original research. This category is appropriate for students who have taken research methods courses whose summative assignment is a research proposal or other research project that does not involve collecting original research data. You will be invited to explain your proposal / secondary research project to the judges. Submissions should take the form of a poster. Posters should measure 48"x36"

Research poster

Apply in this category if you have designed a research project and collected and analyzed data. You will be invited to explain your project and findings to the judges. Submissions should take the form of a poster. Posters should measure 48" x 36".

Research paper

Apply in this category if you have written a research essay. You will be invited to present a fifteen-minute version of your essay in a conference-style panel presentation.

Prizes in each category:

First place $500
Second place $300
Third place $150

Eligibility

swag�鶹 student at the time that the research was conducted or the proposal prepared. We will be accepting students from the Summer 2024, Fall 2024 and Winter 2025 term.
Must be able to present on one of the Student Research Days events.

Judging Criteria

Judging requirements are subject to change.

	4	3	2	1
Grasp of topic and the research process	Poster contains ALL necessary components to convey a complete picture of the proposed study Excellent use of research terminology Conveyed sophisticated understanding of the topic Demonstrated excellent grasp of key research concepts and processes	Poster contains enough components to convey a mostly complete picture of the proposed study Good use of research terminology Conveyed good understanding of the topic Demonstrated good grasp of key research concepts and processes	Poster contains enough components to convey an adequate picture of the proposed study Adequate use of research terminology Conveyed adequate understanding of the topic Demonstrated adequate grasp of research concepts and processes	Poster contains multiple missing components so it is hard to understand the proposed study Poor use of research terminology Conveyed weak understanding of the topic Struggled to convey key research concepts and processes
Poster formatting	The poster is compelling, easy to read, and invites the reader through poster colours and formatting Visuals and graphics effectively communicate key aspects of the research project The poster is well organized and has a logical flow The poster has an appropriate amount of text, is well written with no spelling or grammar errors References are included	The poster is easy to read and invites the reader through poster colours and formatting Visuals and graphics are mostly effective in communicating key aspects of the research project Some adjustments to the formatting are recommended The poster is mostly well organized and has a logical flow Text on the poster is mostly clearly conveyed Some grammar or spelling mistakes	The poster is somewhat hard to read or somewhat uninviting Visuals and graphics are not effective in communicating key aspects of the research project There are notable formatting problems The poster is disorganized or is difficult to follow Text on the poster lacks clarity in some places Frequent grammar or spelling mistakes References are not included	The poster is very hard to read and uninviting Visuals and graphics are unrelated to the research project Poster formatting requires significant revisions The poster is disorganized or is difficult to follow Text on the poster lacks clarity in many places Multiple grammar or spelling mistakes References are not included
Presentation style	Presented engagingly, articulately, and with enthusiasm Conveyed relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience The ‘so what’ of the study is clear and compelling Maintained eye contact	Presentation style was effective, clear, and engaging Conveyed relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience Maintained eye contact	Presentation style was at times effective, clear, and engaging Struggled to convey relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience Intermittent eye contact	Presentation style lacked clarity and was difficult to follow Little to no eye contact

	4	3	2	1
Presentation content (grasp of topic and research concepts)	Excellent use of research terminology Conveyed sophisticated understanding of the topic Demonstrated excellent grasp of key research concepts and processes	Good use of research terminology Conveyed good understanding of the topic Demonstrated good grasp of key research concepts and processes	Presentation style was at times clear, effective, and engaging Struggled to convey relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience Intermittent eye contact	Poor use of research terminology Conveyed weak understanding of the topic Struggled to convey key research concepts and processes
Presentation style	Presented engagingly, articulately, and with enthusiasm Conveyed relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience The “so what” of the study is clear and compelling Maintained eye contact	Presentation style was clear, effective, and engaging Conveyed relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience Maintained eye contact	Adequate use of research terminology Conveyed adequate understanding of the topic Demonstrated adequate grasp of key research concepts and processes	Presentation style lacked enthusiasm Did not reach an interdisciplinary audience Little or no eye contact
Poster formatting	Poster colours, formatting, and use of visuals and graphics effectively conveys the research project The poster is well organized and has logical flow	Poster colours, formatting, and use of visuals and graphics effectively are mostly effective Some adjustments to the formatting are recommended The poster is well organized and has a logical flow	Poster formatting requires revisions The poster is disorganized or is difficult to follow	Poster formatting requires significant revisions The poster is disorganized or is difficult to follow
Poster content	The poster has an appropriate amount of text, is well written with no spelling or grammar errors All components of the research study are included References are included	Text on the poster is mostly clearly conveyed All necessary components of the research study are provided Some grammar or spelling mistakes References are included	Text on the poster lacks clarity Some components of the research study are missing There are some grammar or spelling mistakes and/or references are not included	Text on the poster cannot be understood References are not included

Judging requirements are subject to change.

	4	3	2	1
Presentation style	Presentation style was effective, clear, engaging, and delivered with enthusiasm Maintained eye contact	Presentation style was effective, clear, and engaging Maintained eye contact	Presentation style was at times effective, clear, and engaging Intermittent eye contact	Presentation style lacked clarity and was difficult to follow Little to no eye contact
Originality and exigency of project	Conveyed relevance of research topic to an interdisciplinary audience The “so what” of the study was clear and compelling	Conveyed relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience The “so what” of the study was apparent	Struggled to convey relevance of research topic to interdisciplinary audience	Did not reach an interdisciplinary audience
Content of research essay	Used appropriate methodology according to discipline Presented a compelling argument and developed it persuasively with reference to relevant evidence and sophisticated analysis Conveyed wider significance of findings	Used appropriate methodology according to discipline Presented an argument and developed it with reference to evidence and analysis Conveyed significance of findings	Methodology was not clearly suited to the research project Aspects of an argument were supported by some evidence and analysis Did not convey significance of findings	Methodology was unclear Little detectable argument Did not convey significance of findings

Timeline

Step 1. Apply and submit your abstract by March 17, 2025. &�Բ��;

Step 2. Receive a notification of results on March 19, 2025. &�Բ��;

Step 3. Submit your DOOR Licence and Submission agreement to door@douglascollege.ca (every member of your group is required to sign) by March 21, 2025.

Step 4. Submit your final project:

For a Research Proposal or Research Poster that you would like printed by us, use the link provided in your results email (don't forget to remove your student ID number) by March 21, 2025.
For a Research Proposal or Research Poster that you will print yourself, use the link provided in your results email (don't forget to remove your student ID number) to provide a digital copy by April 4, 2025.

For a Research Paper, use the link provided in your results email (don't forget to remove your student ID number) by April 4, 2025.

Step 5. Join us on the event day – April 8, 2025 (Coquitlam), April 10, 2025 (New Westminster). &�Բ��;

Step 6. Find the final results on the swag�鶹 Website. &�Բ��;

Research poster “How-to” guides

For help with planning, organizing and designing your research poster, visit the the link to our own DC guide to student research posters: .

Other useful guides include:

(Times Higher Education)
(Yale University)
(University of Maryland, Baltimore)
(swag�鶹 Learning Centre)
(NYU Libraries)
(swag�鶹 Library)

Questions?

If you have any questions, please contact Student Life Coordinator.

Contact us

2025 Winners

Posters:

Sophia Wong, Psychology –
Namesh Mathara Arachchi Vidanalage, Computing Studies & Information Systems –
Berntina Hambly, Interdisciplinary Science –

Proposals:

Neda Samarbaf-Zadeh, Social Work –
Khanh Nguyen and Sophie Hoang, Health Information Management –
Simran Vanjara, Sociology –

Paper Panel:

Eve Green, Child and Youth Care –
Elton Henrique de Oliveira Evangelista, Computing Studies & Information Systems –
Alanna Stockford, History –

swag�鶹